Overview
This endpoint provides comprehensive coverage analysis for vocabularies, identifying strengths, gaps, and mapping relationships across different clinical domains and specialties. It helps assess vocabulary completeness and suitability for specific use cases.Path Parameters
The unique identifier for the vocabulary (e.g., “SNOMED”, “ICD10CM”, “LOINC”)
Query Parameters
Type of coverage analysis
Options:
Options:
comprehensive
, domain_focused
, mapping_focused
, specialty_focused
, gap_analysis
Focus analysis on specific domains (comma-separated)
Examples:
Examples:
Condition,Procedure,Drug
, Observation,Measurement
Analyze coverage for specific medical specialties (comma-separated)
Examples:
Examples:
cardiology,oncology,pediatrics
Compare coverage with other vocabularies (comma-separated)
Examples:
Examples:
ICD10CM,LOINC
, RXNORM,NDC
Include detailed mapping coverage analysis
Include recommendations for coverage gaps
Include example concepts for each coverage area
Level of detail for coverage analysis
Options:
Options:
high_level
, domain
, concept_class
, detailed
Specific vocabulary release version (defaults to latest)
Response
Indicates if the request was successful
Usage Examples
Comprehensive Coverage Analysis
Get complete coverage analysis:Specialty-Focused Analysis
Analyze coverage for specific medical specialties:Domain-Specific Coverage
Focus on specific domains:Vocabulary Comparison
Compare coverage with other vocabularies:Gap Analysis
Identify coverage gaps:Analysis Types
Comprehensive
- Complete coverage analysis across all dimensions
- Includes domain, specialty, and mapping coverage
- Provides gap analysis and recommendations
Domain Focused
- Deep dive into specific domain coverage
- Detailed concept class distribution
- Domain-specific gap identification
Mapping Focused
- Cross-vocabulary mapping analysis
- Interoperability assessment
- Mapping quality evaluation
Specialty Focused
- Medical specialty coverage analysis
- Specialty-specific recommendations
- Use case suitability assessment
Gap Analysis
- Identifies coverage limitations
- Prioritizes improvement opportunities
- Provides actionable recommendations
Coverage Scores
Score Interpretation
- 90-100: Excellent coverage
- 75-89: Good coverage
- 60-74: Fair coverage
- 40-59: Poor coverage
- 0-39: Very limited coverage
Factors Considered
- Concept count and distribution
- Hierarchical completeness
- Mapping availability and quality
- Specialty-specific needs
- Use case requirements
Related Endpoints
- Get Vocabulary Statistics - Statistical analysis
- Get Vocabulary Metadata - Comprehensive metadata
- List Domains - Domain information
- Get Concept Mappings - Mapping details